A single center's 15-year experience with palliative limb care for chronic limb threatening ischemia in frail patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our institution's multidisciplinary Prevention of Amputation in Veterans Everywhere (PAVE) program allocates veterans with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) to immediate revascularization, conservative care, primary amputation, or palliative limb care according to previously reported criteria. These four groups align with the approaches outlined by the global guidelines for the management of CLTI. In the present study, we have delineated the natural history of the palliative limb care group of patients and quantified the procedural risks and outcomes. METHODS: Veterans prospectively enrolled into the palliative limb cohort of our PAVE program from January 2005 to January 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall and limb-related readmissions, limb loss, and wound healing. The clinical frailty scale (CFS) score was calculated, and the 5-year expected mortality was estimated using the Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative tool. Regression analysis was performed to establish associations among the following variables: mortality, wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) score, CFS score, overall admissions, and limb-related admissions. RESULTS: The PAVE program enrolled 1158 limbs during 15 years. Of the 1158 limbs, 157 (13.5%) in 145 patients were allocated to the palliative limb care group. The overall mortality of the group was 88.2% (median interval, 3.5 months; range, 0-91 months). Of the 128 patients who had died, 64 (50%) had died within 3 months of enrollment. The predicted 5-year mortality for the group was 66%. The average CFS score for the group was 6.2, denoting persons moderately to severely frail. Using the CFS score, 106 patients were considered frail and 39 were considered not frail. No differences were found in mortality between the frail and nonfrail patients. However, a statistically significant difference was found in early (<3 months) mortality (56.2% vs 37.5%; P = .032). The 30-day limb-related readmission rate was 4.7%. Eventual major amputation was necessary for 18 limbs (11.5%). Wound healing occurred in 30 patients (20.6%). Regression analysis demonstrated no association between the CFS score and mortality (r = 0.55; P = .159) or between the WIfI score and mortality (r = 0.0165; P = .98). However, a significant association was found between the WIfI score and limb-related admissions (r = 0.97; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients with CLTI had high early mortality and a low risk of limb-related complications. They also had a low incidence of deferred primary amputation or limb-related readmissions. In our cohort, the vast majority of patients had died within a few months of enrollment without requiring an amputation. A comprehensive approach to the treatment of CLTI patients should include a palliative limb care option because a significant proportion of these patients will have limited survival and can potentially avoid unnecessary surgery and major amputation.

Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Revascularization: Insights From VOYAGER PAD.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug-coated devices (DCDs) were developed to improve lower extremity revascularization (LER) patency in peripheral artery disease (PAD) but have been associated with long-term mortality. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed DCD safety and effectiveness in LER for PAD. METHODS: VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) randomized patients with PAD who underwent LER to rivaroxaban or placebo. The primary VOYAGER PAD study efficacy and safety outcomes were composite cardiovascular and limb events and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. For prespecified DCD analyses, primary safety and effectiveness outcomes were mortality and unplanned index limb revascularization (UILR). Major adverse limb events (MALE) were a secondary outcome. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to account for each subject's propensity for DCD treatment. Effects of rivaroxaban were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 4,316 patients who underwent LER, 3,478 (80.6%) were treated for claudication, and 1,342 (31.1%) received DCDs. Median follow-up was 31 months, vital status was ascertained in 99.6% of patients, and there were 394 deaths. After weighting, DCDs were not associated with mortality (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83-1.09) or MALE (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90-1.30) but were associated with reduced UILR (3-year Kaplan-Meier: 21.5% vs 24.6%; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). Irrespective of DCD use, consistent benefit of rivaroxaban for composite cardiovascular and limb events (Pinteraction = 0.88) and safety of rivaroxaban with respect to bleeding (Pinteraction = 0.57) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In >4,000 patients with PAD who underwent LER, DCDs were not associated with mortality or MALE but were associated with persistent reduction in UILR. These findings provide insight into the safety and effectiveness of DCDs in PAD. (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD [VOYAGER PAD]; NCT02504216).

Prevalence of elevated serum fatty acid synthase in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

There are currently no serum-based evaluations that can corroborate the severity of peripheral artery disease (PAD). In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the prevalence of elevated serum fatty acid synthase (cFAS) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and evaluated the accuracy of its use in detecting this condition. Preoperative fasting serum samples from 87 patients undergoing vascular intervention were collected between October 2014 and September 2016. Median age was 62 years, with 56 (64%) men, and 32 (37%) with CLTI. We found that elevated cFAS content (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.31), type 2 diabetes (T2D; OR 5.22; 95% CI 1.77-15.4), and smoking (OR 3.53; 95% CI 1.19-10.5) were independently associated with CLTI and could detect the presence of CLTI with 83% accuracy (95% CI 0.74-0.92). Furthermore, serum FAS content was positively correlated with FAS content in femoral artery plaque in patients with severe PAD ([Formula: see text] = 0.22; P = 0.023). Finally, significantly higher co-localization of FAS and ApoB were observed within lower extremity arterial media (P < .001). Our findings indicate that serum FAS content is a marker for disease severity in patients with PAD, independent of concomitant T2D and smoking, and may play a key role in FAS and ApoB peripheral plaque progression.

Detection of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with lower-extremity arterial disease: development and external validations of a risk score.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for screening patients with lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are conflicting. Prediction models might identify patients at high risk of ACS, possibly allowing targeted screening to improve preventive therapy and compliance. METHODS: A systematic search for prediction models for at least 50 per cent ACS in patients with LEAD was conducted. A prediction model in screened patients from the USA with an ankle : brachial pressure index of 0.9 or less was subsequently developed, and assessed for discrimination and calibration. External validation was performed in two independent cohorts, from the UK and the Netherlands. RESULTS: After screening 4907 studies, no previously published prediction models were found. For development of a new model, data for 112 117 patients were used, of whom 6354 (5.7 per cent) had at least 50 per cent ACS and 2801 (2.5 per cent) had at least 70 per cent ACS. Age, sex, smoking status, history of hypercholesterolaemia, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, coronary heart disease and measured systolic BP were predictors of ACS. The model discrimination had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.71 (95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.72) for at least 50 per cent ACS and 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) for at least 70 per cent ACS. Screening the 20 per cent of patients at greatest risk detected 12.4 per cent with at least 50 per cent ACS (number needed to screen (NNS) 8] and 5.8 per cent with at least 70 per cent ACS (NNS 17). This yielded 44.2 and 46.9 per cent of patients with at least 50 and 70 per cent ACS respectively. External validation showed reliable discrimination and adequate calibration. CONCLUSION: The present risk score can predict significant ACS in patients with LEAD. This approach may inform targeted screening of high-risk individuals to enhance the detection of ACS.

Effects of PCSK9 Inhibitor on Favorable Limb Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of evolocumab on favorable limb events in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational study was performed on 30 patients with CLTI. The subjects were divided into 2 groups based on evolocumab administration: evolocumab-treated (E) group ( n=14) and evolocumab non-treated (non-E) group (n=16). The primary outcome was 12-month freedom from major amputation. The secondary outcomes were 12-month amputation-free survival (AFS), overall survival (OS), and wound-free limb salvage. The mean follow-up period was 18±11 months. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected between the two groups for the 12-month freedom from major amputation (log-rank p=0.15), while the 12-month AFS rate was significantly higher in the E group than that in the non-E group (log-rank p=0.02). The 12-month OS rate in the E group was shown a tendency for improvement, as compared with that in the non-E group (log-rank p=0.056). Evolocumab administration was not associated with a significant change in freedom from major amputation (HR, 0.23, 95% CI, 0.03-2.07, p=0.19). However, evolocumab administration was related to a tendency for improvement of AFS and OS (HR, 0.13, 95% CI, 0.02-1.06, p=0.056; HR, 0.16, 95% CI, 0.02-1.37, p=0.09, respectively). Moreover, The E group had a higher proportion of wound-free limb salvage at 12 months (92% vs. 42%, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Evolocumab administration was associated with a better AFS outcome in patients with CLTI. Long-term administration of evolocumab over 12 months contributed to improving proportion of wound-free limb salvage.

Risk Stratification for 2-Year Mortality in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.

AIM: The latest Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) recommend assessing the 2-year mortality risk in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) before revascularization. This study aimed to reveal whether the Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification, developed originally as a risk assessment tool for limb prognosis, would be useful in predicting the 2-year mortality risk in patients with CLTI in the era of GVG and WIfI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 849 patients with CLTI who were primarily treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) between April 2010 and December 2016. The impact of baseline characteristics, including the WIfI classification on mortality risk, was investigated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 19.3 months, 243 deaths were observed. The 2-year mortality rate was 32.3%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that WIfI classification stages (p=0.037), in addition to male sex (p=0.010), age (p＜0.001), non-ambulatory status (p＜0.001), body mass index (p=0.002), and hemodialysis (p＜0.001), were independent predictors for an increased risk of mortality, while the Rutherford classification was not. CONCLUSIONS: WIfI classification stages were independently associated with mortality risk in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT, while the Rutherford classification was not. The WIfI classification would be a practical tool for planning the revascularization strategy in CLTI treatment.

Classificação WifI: o novo sistema de classificação da Society for Vascular Surgery para membros inferiores ameaçados, uma revisão de literatura / WIfI classification: the Society for Vascular Surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system, a literature review

Resumo A Society for Vascular Surgery propôs nova classificação para o membro inferior ameaçado, baseada nos três principais fatores influenciadores do risco de amputação do membro: ferida (Wound, W), isquemia (Ischemia, I) e infecção do pé (foot Infection, fI): a classificação WIfI. Esta abrange também os diabéticos, anteriormente excluídos do conceito de isquemia crítica do membro devido a seu quadro clínico complexo. O objetivo da classificação era fornecer estratificação de risco precisa e precoce ao paciente com membro inferior ameaçado; auxiliar no manejo clínico, permitindo comparar terapias alternativas; e predizer o risco de amputação em 1 ano e a necessidade de revascularização. O objetivo deste estudo é reunir os principais pontos abordados sobre a classificação WIfI no meio científico. A maior parte dos estudos de validação da classificação demonstram sua associação à predição de salvamento do membro, eventos de reintervenção, amputação e estenose, taxas de amputação maior e menor, sobrevida livre de amputação, e cicatrização de feridas.

Abstract The Society for Vascular Surgery has proposed a new classification system for the threatened lower limb, based on the three main factors that have an impact on limb amputation risk: Wound (W), Ischemia (I) and foot Infection ("fI") - the WIfI classification. The system also covers diabetic patients, previously excluded from the concept of critical limb ischemia because of their complex clinical condition. The classification's purpose is to provide accurate and early risk stratification for patients with threatened lower limbs; assisting with clinical management, enabling comparison of alternative therapies; and predicting risk of amputation at 1 year and the need for limb revascularization. The objective of this study is to collect together the main points about the WIfI classification that have been discussed in the scientific literature. Most of the studies conducted for validation of this classification system prove its association with factors related to limb salvage, such as amputation rates, amputation-free survival, prediction of reintervention, amputation, and stenosis (RAS) events, and wound healing.